where vintage lenses live on.

Mamiya 58mm f1.7 M42 Lens
Home > Mamiya Sekor 58mm f1.7 Lens Review
Mantas Avatar

posted on


Mamiya Sekor 58mm f1.7 Lens Review

Mamiya Sekor 58mm f1.7 is another vintage lens from the 1960s – having a somewhat rare focal length and aperture combination, producing soft bokeh and strong object separation. 

History and versions

Mamiya Sekor 58mm f1.7 F.C. – Exakta mount

Mamiya Sekor 58mm f1.7 F.C., released in 1961, alongside the Mamiya’s first production SLR camera – the Mamiya Prismat NP. This camera used an Exakta mount; therefore, the first version of the Sekor 58mm f1.7 can easily be adapted to modern cameras using the widely available Exakta adapters. 

Mamiya Sekor 58mm f1.7 – M42 mount

In 1964 Mamiya launched a successor to the Prismat – Mamiya/Sekor CP, also known as the CWP in the USA. It came with the M42 version of the Mamiya Sekor 58mm f1.7. Later versions of the lens contained radioactive lens elements – meaning a change in the optical design had occurred. M42 version is also the rarest because Mamiya only made it for two years. 

Radioactivity status of various serial numbers:

1078918 – non-radioactive
1114184 – non-radioactive
1116227 – radioactive
1116362 – radioactive
1116372 – radioactive

Argus-Sekor 58mm f1.7

The third version is in the form of Argus-Sekor 58mm f1.7, which Mamiya made for Argus between 1962-1966. This camera had a unique mount, not used on any other camera system, therefore adapting is difficult without lens modification. 

Mamiya Sekor 58mm f1.7 M42 Lens radioactivity

Later versions of the Mamiya Sekor 58mm f1.7 M42 are mildly radioactive – indicating that lens includes thorium-containing glass. Exakta and Argus versions don’t contain thoriated glass – suggesting that there are different optical specifications between radioactive M42 and the non-radioactive versions. 

Is it dangerous?

It is relatively safe. Radioactivity is mild, and very ‘favourably’ placed – radiating mainly from the front of the lens towards the subject, and not from the rear element towards the user. This placement of the radioactive component makes it safer for both the user and the camera because the radiation level at the rear of the lens is barely noticeable above the background level. I’ve written a long article about radioactive lenses, explaining everything in detail. 


While the radioactivity emitted by the lens is small and generally harmless, it can still cause trouble if mishandled. Most importantly, protect the lens from damage and minimise your exposure to it. Try not to store it in your bedroom.

Some lenses have radioactive elements in the rear of the lens – these lenses should not be left on the camera, as they can potentially damage the sensors and electronics. Radiation damage results in the formation of hot pixels on the sensor. Doses required to inflict this damage are much larger than the radioactive lens can give; however, I do not want to risk developing hot pixels and therefore take my radioactive lenses off the camera after use. 

Increased radiation exposure can cause cataracts in the eyes, therefore do not expose your eyes unnecessarily – keep your distance when cleaning and inspecting radioactive lenses.

For uses of thoriated optical glass that are authorized under this exemption, the lens would be enclosed by other materials or there would be additional material between the lens and the tissues of an exposed individual, and only photon exposures would be of concern. However, in unauthorized uses of thoriated optical glass, such as eyepieces of optical instruments, exposure to the eye to alpha and beta particles also would be of concern. This concern is because of the proximity of the glass to the eye and lack of sufficient absorbing material between the source and tissues of the eye.” – nrc.gov NUREG-1717 Page 3–288

These general precautions are mandatory when handling any radioactive material — especially alpha-emitting thoriated glass which is far more damaging inside the body than outside of it. Take care not to drop or shatter this lens inside your home, as it will contaminate it.

Oak Ridge Associated Universities as an excellent post about lens radioactivity. 

Mamiya Sekor 58 mm f1.7 specifications

Focal length: 58mm
Aperture: f1.7 – f16
Number of aperture blades: 10
View angle: 40.5 degrees
Construction: 6 elements in 4 groups
Filter size: 52mm / 0.75 pitch
Non-radioactive: Exakta and Argus versions
Radioactive: M42 version is 1.19 uSv/h measured with GMC-300E Plus

Build quality

These lenses are made of metal and glass. They are very sturdy and built like a tank.


These lenses are uncommon, and prices can vary dramatically from £50 to £300. It will depend on the condition of the lens and its location. Try to look on eBay USA, and eBay UK – primary markets of the Mamiya Prismat cameras. Also try other sites such as Bonanza, or Google Shopping. You will likely have to search for some time to get this lens.


Mamiya Sekor 58mm f1.7 is a competent lens for its age – images are contrasty and sharp. The tones of the black and white photos are pleasing, showing good micro-contrast. Closeup shots using extension tubes are vivid and detailed, with silky backgrounds. 

I rate this lens 5 out of 5. The performance does justify the price, and the rarity consequently makes it a good investment.

Sample photos

Shot RAW with Canon EOS R mirrorless camera, slightly adjusted in Lightroom, and exported as JPEG. All shots handheld with various aperture settings on several different days. 


14 responses to “Mamiya Sekor 58mm f1.7 Lens Review”

  1. Emil Avatar

    Argus-Sekor 58mm f1.7 is not radioactive ?

    1. Mantas Avatar

      Hi Emil, I did measure it with GMC-600 Plus (Alpha, Beta, Gamma sensitive) pancake type detector, and the two samples of the Argus version that I have in my inventory are not showing increased radioactivity.

  2. chanik Avatar

    I have the fc version , when comes to clarity this lens is a beast n glad to have swirly bokeh to

    1. Mantas Avatar

      Yup, I am glad you like it! I also use the F.C version, but I am yet to write more about it. One day 🙂

  3. fujijama Avatar

    I own 2 of these, love them. But too much crap about lens radioactivity. They were radioactive and will be, get used to it nobody died from it or lost an eye sight or caught a brain tumor. Imagine photographers back in the day worry about radioactivity of the lens? LOOOL….

    1. Mantas Avatar

      I actually like the fact that they are radioactive. That makes these lenses truly unique. No new lenses will ever be made with radioactive glass. So we have these beauties from the past, and that is it.

  4. james swenson jr Avatar
    james swenson jr

    this is my favorite 58 mm lens , i have 2 m42 and one argus mount adapted to my sony A7 MK I , chromatic aberration almost zero wide open

  5. Dave C. Avatar


    I have an Argus version ax well. May I ask please how you adapted it to an eMount?

    1. Mantas Avatar

      There is a hacky way – Argus fits a Konica AR mount – but it is quite loose. The way to solve it is to add some padding – use sticky tape on the AR mount, one or two layers. That will help to fit it into place. It won’t lock, but it will become usable. It will be able to focus quite a lot past infinity, in essence losing some close-focussing ability.

  6. K coyne Avatar
    K coyne

    What’s the sensor coverage on the 58mm?

    1. Mantas Avatar

      It’s a full frame lens.

  7. Casper Avatar

    This M42 one on youtube with serial #1081283 is apparently radioactive (at least the front glass). https://youtu.be/aPjCIFM8sME?si=uat7nwoT2QFZp2f2

    The serial nr is in between the two oldest examples you list, that are supposedly not radioactive, which is a bit of a contradiction . Could it be that those were Geiger tested only on the rear?

    1. Mantas Avatar

      Thank you for this valuable input. I will re-check and update. Those lenses are all slightly different, it may be impossible to find a pattern – maybe there is no pattern to be found at all.

      1. Casper Avatar

        Discussed this on mflenses forum after I just received my sample of this lens.
        A member suggested that these lenses probably don’t contain thoriated glass, but lanthanum glass, which is often ‘contaminated’ with some thorium. The radioactivity of the glass can depend on the the specific batch of lanthanum glass. It would explain why radioactivity levels vary so heavily, and why some measure it at the front and others at the back of the lens. This makes sense to me, also because I see no yellowing of the glass (at least not in my lens).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *