where vintage lenses live on.

Konica Hexanon AR 50mm f1.7
Home > Konica Hexanon 50mm f1.7 AR Lens Review
Mantas Avatar

posted on

in

Konica Hexanon 50mm f1.7 AR Lens Review

Konica Hexanon 50mm f1.7 is the entry-level standard lens in the Hexanon lineup, along with a faster 50mm f1.4 and the iconic 57mm f1.2. All three lenses are great but have slightly different characteristics. 

Konica AR Lens guide describes it eloquently as “Budget priced standard lens. Lightweight and compact. Focuses down to 18 inches“.

Although 50mm f1.7 is the slowest, it is the sharpest and an outright excellent performer, probably having the best price/performance ratio of all my tested lenses. There are cheaper lenses, and there are better lenses, but I doubt there are more affordable, better lenses. If there are, I want to know about them!

Konica Hexanons are not as popular as other vintage lenses because they were challenging to adapt before the onset of mirrorless cameras. Flange distance of the lenses was shorter than that of most DSLR cameras, prohibiting easy adapters. Mirrorless cameras, such as Canon EOS R which I am using, allow easy adapting of the Konica AR Hexanon lenses without complicated adapters.

Mechanics

Konica Hexanon AR 50mm f1.7 is a beautiful, sturdy, well-built lens. Earlier models feature a full metal and glass construction, later models having a rubber focus ring. The focus is smooth, accurate and easy to use, but could be a little more damped. Nonetheless, focussing is straightforward and gives predictable results. Focus peaking on EOS R works well with this lens. 

Aperture control is not as refined or smooth like on other vintage lenses. It feels similar to Pentacon and the late Zeiss Jena where the aperture is clicky, tactile and easy to adjust. Aperture has six blades – not enough for round highlights when stopped down. Hexagon shapes are visible in the out of focus areas, which can be distracting, depending on the subject.

Flange Distance and Compatibility

Flange distance is a distance between the lens mount and the sensor, a crucial metric when adapting vintage lenses. The camera’s flange distance has to be shorter than that of the lens to provide space for the adapter. 

Otherwise, adapters have optical elements or the lens is unable to focus to infinity. Cheap adapters impact image quality, while good ones impact the wallet. For the above reason, adapters with optical components are undesirable. 

Flange distances of Canon and Konica systems:

Canon RF – 20mm
Konica AR – 40.5mm
Canon FD – 42mm
Canon EF – 44mm

Canon EOS R can adapt all of the above mounts without optical adapters, while Canon EF SLRs cannot. SLRs also have issues with adapted lenses going too deep into the camera and obstructing the mirror, potentially damaging the camera.

I use a simple Fotasy Konica AR to EOS RF adapter that I bought from Amazon. The connection between the adapter and the lens is very sturdy -it fits like a glove, with no play or wobble between the lens and the camera. 

Performance

Performance of the Konica Hexanon AR 50mm f1.7 is superb – the images are contrasty and sharp. Even wide-open the centre of the frame is sufficiently detailed for the great-looking portraits. Sharpness significantly improves when stopped down, and becomes adequate for most photos from about f2.8. Subject separation is excellent, and background blur (bokeh) is pleasing. 

Vignetting is strong when wide-open but improves quickly at smaller apertures. 

Shooting into the sun causes flaring with a (subjectively) beautiful bright blue flares. Blue cast sometimes covers significant portions of the image, allowing creative use of this lens to enhance the mood. Overall, I love the colour reproduction of the Hexanon 50mm f1.7, and it is one of the reasons I have used this lens for a long time, in various locations. 

Images get a painting-like appearance in these wide-open shots of the forest. 

Price and availability

Konica Hexanon lenses are not rare – there are plenty going around – but finding a good example can be challenging. I purchased a few Konica lenses with fungus and scratches, even when described as in good condition. They are not as coveted as Carl Zeiss, so I suspect people did not look after them. 

Influenced by the adoption of mirrorless cameras, all Konica Hexanon lenses have started to increase in price. Konica Hexanons still offer tremendous performance for the price. I bought the 50mm f1.7 on eBay for 60 GBP / 70 EUR / 80 USD, but they used to sell for significantly less only a few years ago.

Versions

There are two versions of the Konica Hexanon 50mm f1.7 AR:

  • Early model released in 1973. The minimum focus distance is 45 cm, and the aperture has the half stops (the version in this review).
  • The later model made from 1976. The lens is lighter, but the minimum focus distance is increased to 55 cm, and the aperture half stops are gone. 

Optical properties and lens schematics are the same. 

Hexanon 50mm f1.7 AR Specifications

Taking angle: 46 degrees
Construction: 6 elements, 5 groups
Minimum focus distance: 18 in / 45 cm (55 cm in later version)
Focusing: Manual
Aperture: f1.7 – f16 with half stops (no half stops in a later version)
Filter / Hood : Screw in 55mm
Weight: 8.5 ozs / 240 gr
Made in: Japan between 1973 and 1979

Radioactivity

Konica Hexanon 50mm f1.7 AR is not radioactive. I routinely test lenses for radioactivity as part of my testing. Documenting lens radioactivity has become my hobby. Konica used thoriated glass in the top of the line Hexanon 57mm f1.2, which is slightly radioactive but omitted it from f1.4 or the f1.7 versions.

Conclusion

Konica Hexanon 50mm f1.7 AR is neither rare nor unusual – nonetheless, it punches above its weight where it matters – offering image quality for a fair price. Bluish flares can add a lot of character if used intentionally. This lens would equally suit a vintage lens enthusiast or someone just starting. Overall, this is an excellent lens, and I would rate it 5 out of 5. 

What do you think about the Konica Hexanon 50mm f1.7? Does it match my findings? Let me know by sharing a comment below.

Sample Images

Comments

13 responses to “Konica Hexanon 50mm f1.7 AR Lens Review”

  1. Hank Taylor Avatar
    Hank Taylor

    I love the old vintage lenses and after reading your article I decided to pick one up, now waiting to try out on my SL with adapter. Will let you know how well it does.
    Thanks
    Hank
    P.S. One of my favorite lenses on my SL is the Steinheil Auto-Quinon 55mm f1.9,

    1. Mantas Avatar

      Amazing, let me know how it goes with the Konica! I also want to get the Quinon, but the prices are quite high. I haven’t found a cheap one yet.

      1. Hank Taylor Avatar
        Hank Taylor

        Keep looking they are out there. Well worth finding.

      2. luc charlier Avatar
        luc charlier

        Took me a while to find an affordable Quinon 55 mm as well. “Cheap”, they cannot be. Eventually paid 290 € from Langen in Germany, just 363 days ago, and I don’t regret one single penny. It’s an M42 mount version and it is as good as new. You spend even more time looking at it than shooting, such a beauty it is!

  2. luc charlier Avatar
    luc charlier

    Big fan of Konica’s lenses myself. Must have a dozen of them, amongst which AR 50 mm 1,4 and 1,7 / 52 mm 1,8 / 57 mm 1,4 and … yes, 1,2, my most expensive lens! I share your enthusiasm for this one (and all others). Their 40 mm is an unusual focal length and the images are very unusual as well, a pleasure and an experience to shoot with. As for the 85 mm, yes it is quite heavy but it is a superb piece of optics. One caveat (I use many systems, both mirrorless and reflex): they conflict quite strongly with the “infinity lens” included in the adapters to Nikon F, even when sticking to basic rules (not wide open, no backlight, no over-exposure). I suppose it is because they make use of very complicated and very balanced optical formulas (not a single triplet nor a Tessar-like design). Once you add an extra magnifying-glass, alien to the original design, old father Gauss feels disturbed! As ever, your article is informative and a pleasure to read. I still hope one day we’ll disagree, but it didn’t happen up to now.

  3. […] Among them, I noticed Konica Autoreflex TC – a somewhat newer and smaller model, with Hexanon 50mm f1.7 lens. Although I didn’t even consider it at first, mainly because of its plastic body, I […]

  4. Chris T. Avatar
    Chris T.

    Great review and very informative. I am slowly becoming a fan of the konica hexanon lenses while I’ve been enjoying my 135 f3.2. Thank you again!

  5. Robert Baker Avatar
    Robert Baker

    My copy of the Konica Hexanon 50mm 1.4 is definitely radioactive, more so than most of my other radioactive lenses.

  6. Marc Gordon Avatar
    Marc Gordon

    I picked up this Konica Hexanon lens last week. It is a spectacular performer on my Fujifilm X-E3. It provided beautiful colors and bokeh. The center is sharp and at times soft on the corners. I do have to mention the amount of flare that I received. At times, it could be overwhelming. It is not designed for areas such as the desert with plenty of sun that could be a challenge to contain at times.

  7. Kevin Shorter Avatar
    Kevin Shorter

    Hey Mantas, per you comment …

    “Early model released in 1973. The minimum focus distance is 45 cm, and the aperture has the half stops (the version in this review).
    The later model made from 1976. The lens is lighter, but the minimum focus distance is increased to 55 cm, and the aperture half stops are gone.”

    I own both versions and am sitting here comparing the two versions. What you review here and call the early model is the higher serial number of my two lenses. Wouldn’t that make this one the newer version?

    Also. My lower serial number lens, not the model one you review here, is the lighter one, min focus is 55cm and the aperture only has full stop click and not half stop clicks.

    Unless Konica started going down in serial numbers as they produced newer lenses, it would appear something is amiss on this.

    Best regards … Kevin

    1. Mantas Avatar

      Hi Kevin, thank you very much for your input; I will look into this and update the review.

      1. Kevin Shorter Avatar
        Kevin Shorter

        Thanks for checking further and I’ll look back to see what you find. Cause I can’t say I know for sure on this. I just found the serial numbers on the two versions seemed to indicate something different. And I tend to have an inquiring mind. kbs

      2. Kevin Shorter Avatar
        Kevin Shorter

        Hey Mantas,

        I have emailed the webmaster at buhla.de, https://buhla.de/Foto/Konica/eKonicaStart.html. I’ve always reference here as the definitive Konica info spot. And his information matches your information. So I wrote him and asked if this is correct, can it actually be possible that Konica serial numbers went down as they produced this lens.

        I’m not sure if he’s still active. However, if I get a reply I’ll send you what I get.

        Best regards, Kevin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *