Voigtländer Septon 50mm f2 was top of the line lens for the Bessamatic cameras – introduced in 1959 and made until 1967. This lens competed with the best lenses from other German manufacturers like Carl Zeiss and the wave of Japanese imports coming into the market. It was exceptionally well made, utilised the best materials and lens calculations available at the time.
Voigtländer was founded in Vienna, Austria in 1756 by Johann Voigtländer. Throughout the years, Voigländer pioneered a lot of lens designs, including the well-known Nokton and Ultron amongst many others.
Carl Zeiss bought the majority stake in Voigtländer in 1956, although Voigtlander remained mostly independent. It competed with Zeiss until around 1970. Since then, the lines of cameras and lenses were harmonised, and Zeiss produced the camera bodies, while Voigtlander produced the lenses. Bessamatic range of cameras and lenses were the last of independent Voigtländer products.
Bessamatic was Voigtländer’s first 35mm SLR camera with interchangeable lenses. Looking at it today, it resembles a work of art, a technological marvel utilising the most expensive materials. However, it featured a complex leaf shutter which had a smallish aperture of only 20.5 mm – a design decision which resulted in lenses not being faster than f2.
The fastest lenses for Bessamatic was the Septon 50mm f2 reviewed here, and the Skopagon 40mm f2 – both using unique lens designs, necessitated by the small aperture size of the leaf shutter.
Voigländer Septon 50mm f2 lens design
Septon is an unusual gauss type lens. Written historical details about this lens are almost non-existent. I found a few manuals and some brochures, but apart that – nothing. There was no patent – presumably because there was no need for one for the design derived from an already patented lens.
Information on the online forums regarding the originating design is conflicting – there are differing opinions on whether Septon is based on the Ultron 50mm f2 or a Nokton 50mm f1.5 – both earlier Albrecht Tronnier’s famous designs. I compared the lens diagrams from the patents of both, and to me, it seems that Septon is much more like the Nokton. Ultron just looks different and is six vs seven elements.
Similarity to Hasselblad Planar 80mm f2.8
While no other lens was called Septon again or had an identical optical formula, a similar lens configuration was used for another iconic lens – Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm f2.8 (1957) for Hasselblad.
“The Planar® lens is the most successful camera lens design ever created. This nearly symmetrical layout provides the lens designer with numerous means to correct aberrations extraordinarily well, even for wide open apertures. ” – Carl Zeiss lens datasheet
Are these two lenses related? It’s arguable. I was not able to confirm who designed the Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm, or which one was designed first. Planar 80mm f2 was released in 1957, and Septon in 1959 – planar came first. At the time Voigtlander was already owned by Zeiss, and even though the two entities were producing competing products, Zeiss could use Voigtlander’s technology and patents. It would be interesting to find a detailed chronology of these two lenses.
Mechanical build and materials are all top-notch – the barrel is finely machined from steel and focus ring is smooth and well-damped. There is no aperture ring, as the aperture is controlled via the camera (or the adapter). The whole physical appearance, quality of manufacture and attention to detail are all evident in every aspect of the lens. To me, build quality is as important as the resultant image quality – and this lens delivers.
Voigtlander Septon 50mm f2 suffers from the potential separation of glass elements. I found out the hard way – the first Septon I purchased had it.
Separation happens when lens groups split, opening air gaps in between the elements. Those air gaps don’t transmit light well, causing ghosting and reduced contrast. While a tiny amount around the edges of the lens is not even going to show up in the images, a more substantial separation is going to severely affect the image quality and value of the camera lens.
Sometimes the material holding the lens groups together dries up due to heat or storage. Manufacturing imperfections such as small dust particles present at the time of assembly can cause separation many years down the line.
There are no easy fixes for separation. There are a couple of options such as replacement of the separated lens group with a healthy one, or completely separating, cleaning, and recementing the group together. That is no straightforward task, as lenses are challenging to realign correctly again without special equipment.
Older lenses are generally more prone to it because of their age, materials used at the time, and the conditions they endured throughout their life. Modern lenses use improved cement which is unlikely to separate. Nevertheless, I still keep all lenses away from direct sunlight and don’t allow them to heat up unnecessarily. I am also more vigilant when buying older lenses, ensuring that not even the smallest amount of separation exists, as, with time, it will only get worse.
It is easy to tell when the lens has separation – colourful reflections appear inside the glass.
I did not detect any radiation above the background level. This lens does not contain any exotic radioactive glass with thorium and can be safely used. It may include Lanthanum glass, but radiation from it is so minute that my equipment can not detect it.
Voigtländer Septon 50mm f2 versions
There are two versions of Voigtländer Septon. The first version was produced between 1959 and 1966 and had a minimum focus of 0.9 meters.
The later version was only offered towards the end of production between 1966 and 1967 and had a longer barrel and much shorter minimum focus distance of 60 cm. Yellow dot on one of the mount screws indicates that the lens is capable of automatic aperture control. Only 6858 of the V2 lenses were made. (Link)
Voigtlander Septon 50mm f2 can range in price between 150 and 300 GBP on eBay UK. It is slightly cheaper on eBay Germany at 120 – 280 EUR with Bessamatic body, and somewhat more expensive on eBay USA at about 200-400 USD.
Focal length: 50mm
Aperture: f2 – f22 (controlled from the camera via an aperture lever)
Lens construction: 7 elements in 5 groups
Minimum focus distance: 0.6m (v2), 0.9m (v1)
Number of blades: 5
Mount: Bessamatic Deckel DKL
Filter thread: 54mm
Compatibility and the DKL to EOS R adapter
Voigtlander Septon uses the DKL (Deckel) mount of the Bessamatic / Ultramatic cameras. Kodak Retina cameras used the similar DKL mount, but the lenses are not interchangeable between the cameras. The Haoge adapter that I use allows both DKL variants to be used. It is also very well made and matches the style of the lenses.
The adapters are slightly more complicated because they have to include the aperture ring, which is not part of the lenses.
Both mirrorless and SLR cameras can use DKL lenses; however, on full-frame SLR cameras, DKL lenses can hit the mirror at infinity. Mirrorless cameras have no such issues.
Haoge also makes DKL end cap, made out of solid metal. I bought a few to protect the lenses.
Voigtländer Septon showcases German lens manufacturing skills. The images are vibrant, sharp, contrasty, and have a pleasing analogue look to them. The scenes are alive. Colours are beautiful, with subtle gradations. I do not have anything to complain about in terms of image quality. Yes – it does not have the smoothest bokeh of the f1.2’s or greatest flare resistance of modern coatings, but those are minor inconveniences with this very usable vintage lens.
Extension rings work very well too, so minimum focus distance can be lessened and magnification increased. The extension ring sample images show a lot of detail and high contrast.
Nice image rendering
A descendant of Nokton 50mm f1.5
Feels amazing to use
Prone to lens separation
On the expensive side
Minimum focus distance
Voigtlander Septon has a lot of positives and a few negatives. It can’t compare to modern lenses with absolute sharpness or corrections – after all, it’s now over 50 years old. Yet to vintage lens lovers, this lens is the epitome of perfection. Voigtländer has put all its effort into the Bessamatic system, and it shows.
I would rate this lens 5 out of 5. Even the higher price is justifiable in the context of history and quality of this lens.
Did you like this review? Do you have something to add about this lens? Please leave a comment!
Shot RAW with Canon EOS R mirrorless camera, slightly adjusted in Lightroom, and exported as JPEG. All shots handheld with various aperture settings on several different days.
14 Replies to “Voigtländer Septon 50mm f2 Lens Review”
Thank you for this excellent write-up on the Septon. It has been on my radar for quite some time. Have you compared images shot with the Septon and the Nokton 50/1.5? I am curious to see how they compare.
Also, do you happen to know if the separation issue is any different between the two versions of the lens?
Thank you for your kind words! I don’t have a copy of the Voigtlander Nokton 50/1.5 to compare, but I did look at samples from Flickr (https://www.flickr.com/groups/[email protected]/pool/) and it does look like the images have a similar character. Although that group is polluted with pictures from the “new” Japanese Nokton. Try looking for “Prominent Nokton” for some more results from the original Nokton lens. I would love to get the Nokton and compare directly at some point.
In terms of separation – it is difficult to say. It was the first version lens that had the separation. The second version is quite rare, but it is also a few years younger, so it is possible that better materials or manufacturing techniques were used. The best bet is to really check with the seller, ask questions, get them to take pictures from all sides, and look for signs of separation. If it doesn’t have it now, it probably won’t develop it in the future.
I really enjoyed reading this review. Thanks!
I have one of these lenses and a Bessamatic. I found it in a second-hand camera store in New Zealand (where I’m from) in the 90s and used it a few times then and off-and-on since. I still have it (and the camera) and it all still works great. However, mine does suffer from the separation you mention, it’s quite extensive but still takes great pictures. I’ve a film in the camera which reading this has inspired me to finish taking and get it developed, it’s been in there a while…
At around the time I bought this, I had actually three Bessamatics in various states of working and not working. I was in a camera shop in Wellington and had the camera with me when one of the older men who worked there spotted it and told me that he used to work at the Voigtlander factory in Germany when these were being made in the 60s. I told him I had three of them and he said he could make one really good camera out of the three. So he took them and after a few months he had indeed made the one good one that I still have and he kept the remaining bits and was going to make another good one for himself. He thanked me because he’d really enjoyed working on the cameras again after so many years and I was really happy he’d made me one good one. I had also two Skopar lenses but obviously I kept the Septon and he took the others – I also paid him for his work of course 🙂
I have the 135mm Super-Dynarex as well but never use it.
So anyway, thanks again for this review, it was great to read about the history and technical detail of this lens. Cheers! Stephen
Hi Stephen, glad you enjoyed the review and especially that it inspired you to take the Bessamatic out of the bag and start shooting it! Hope the photos in the film are amazing!
Thanks for the review, I came across a Bessamatic with the Septon that has lens separation, I can still focus it and have film inside, so I hope it works ok still.
It’s a beautiful camera and looks like new.
Thanks Derek! It is indeed an amazing camera. Let me know how the results turn out to be!
Do any of you guys know anybody that can repair Voigtlander Ultramatic cameras? I bought one from an estate sale on eBay. It has the lens mentioned in this article. The camera and lens look brand new. The lens is clean and clear and does not suffer from the separation that is common in this Septon lens. Problem is that the silver halide inside has corroded and my view through the viewfinder is about 70 percent obscured. Also. I am not sure if the shutter speeds are firing at the intended speeds since the camera probably sat for so long. I would love to be able to use this camera but it may end up being a display piece if I cannot find someone who can do quality work on this Ultramatic.
Sorry to hear about the camera. Glad the lens survived, as I did see a lot of them with separation issues. Where are you based?
Once again in full agreement with you Mantas. This lens is exceptional in many respects. On top of that, the DKL mount is really a plus for me, allowing use on about any system you care to mention (mirrorless, Canon, Nikon, 4/3 or M4/3 …). Moreover, one could consider the Ultron is the ultimate effort of Zeiss cameras to fight for survival, and Septon plays the same role for Bessamatic/Ultramatic (Prakticar 50 mm f/1,4 for Pentacon etc …). Using old lenses is like riding an old Triumph motorcycle: you feel at unisson with History! Only difference, with a Bonneville, a Trident or a Tiger, you’re not quite sure you’ll be able to ride back home …
Do the septon lenses need a convector for the leica m11?
Hi, thanks for visiting! Yes, you need a “Voigtlander DKL Lens To Leica M LM Adapter”. Try to search for this string on eBay. You should find some examples. I use the Haoge brand.
Very interesting and informative article, thank you !
Would you know how it compares with the basic Color-Skopar version which I have ?
I am enjoying shooting with my Bessamatic, the 50mm Color-Skopar and the 35mm Skoparex.
Before purchasing the Septon, as it’s quite expensive, I would like to make sure it’s really worth it.
Thanks again !